Watch it run
Seven seconds from inbox to a balanced journal entry, with the policy check and the approval gate shown in full.
Watch the agentThe difference
A parallel ledger that reconciles to your existing system every morning — to the penny, per account, per period.
See the tie-outCase study
Consolidated reporting in eleven days, without leaving the accounting system they already ran.
Read the storyMost requested
Most ERP projects miss their business case. We take over stalled deployments and get them closing books again.
Get a free assessmentEditorial policy
No paid placement, published criteria, disclosed ownership on every page. The directory is worth more than any deal it could win.
Read the methodologyNew research
We surveyed finance leaders on what actually went wrong. The answers are not what vendors tell you.
Read the studyPartner program
Accounting firms, fractional CFOs, and ERP consultants deliver implementations on our platform.
Become a partnerReference
Ledger, close, revenue recognition, and consolidation terminology, written for people evaluating financial systems rather than for accountants — with notes where a concept is commonly implemented badly.
Tell us what you were looking for and we will add it, or explain why we left it out.
Not because the concepts are difficult, but because they are the ones implemented badly often enough that a demo reveals real differences between products.
Several terms here describe determinations that require professional judgement — whether an obligation is distinct, whether a cost is capitalisable, what basis to use for overhead allocation. No system should make those, and any vendor implying theirs does is describing something you would not want.
What a system should do is record the determination, who made it, and when, so a reviewer can evaluate the decision rather than only its result.
These definitions are written to help you evaluate software. They are not a substitute for your accountants, and the treatment appropriate to your circumstances is a question for them. Where a definition here differs from how your auditors apply a standard, theirs governs.
Questions
What the system does next tells you more about its architecture than an hour of feature discussion will.