Accounting and CPA firms
You advise clients whose systems cannot produce what you need to advise on. Referral, co-delivery on the data work, and read-only auditor access as standard.
Partners
We sell direct and implement our own product, so this is not a reseller channel. It is a referral and co-delivery relationship for advisers whose clients keep hitting the same problems — and it is deliberately small, because a large partner network is how implementation quality becomes a lottery.
Tell us who your clients are and what keeps breaking. We will say whether the fit is real.
Partners
These are genuinely different relationships rather than tiers of the same one, and the commercial terms differ accordingly.
You advise clients whose systems cannot produce what you need to advise on. Referral, co-delivery on the data work, and read-only auditor access as standard.
You inherit a finance function every few months and spend the first six weeks fixing the same things. Referral plus a standing diagnostic arrangement so you can assess a new client in week one.
You need consistent reporting across a portfolio of companies on different systems. Portfolio-level integration rather than per-company migrations.
You do process and systems work and need a financial layer under it. Co-delivery, with clear lines about who owns what.
You introduce a client. We scope the work, tell you and them honestly what we think — including when the answer is that they do not need us — and if it proceeds, we deliver it. You keep the client relationship throughout and we do not sell around you.
There is no requirement to be certified, trained, or badged before you can refer someone. A gate on referrals exists to make a channel look substantial, not to make outcomes better, and we would rather have five partners who send us well-qualified work than fifty who have completed a course.
Disclosure is a condition, not a courtesy. If you refer a client to us and receive a fee, you must disclose that to the client. We will ask you to confirm it, and we will tell the client ourselves if asked. An adviser recommending a vendor who pays them, without saying so, is the practice we criticise on our own editorial policy page — we are not going to fund it quietly.
Most mid-market ERP is sold through partners, and the variance between a good and a poor partner exceeds the variance between the products they implement. We have been called into enough stalled implementations to be wary of the model.
Our response is to sell direct and implement ourselves, which has real disadvantages we state on our own comparison pages: no local presence, no vertical specialists in industries we have not worked in, and no capacity buffer when demand spikes. A partner network solves those, and it introduces the failure mode we spend a lot of pages warning buyers about.
So we keep it narrow and referral-shaped rather than delivery-shaped. If your clients need local hands-on implementation capacity across many industries, we are honestly not the vendor with the answer to that.
Read our editorial policy before applying. We take no referral fees from any vendor, and we say publicly that most independent selection advisers take fees from the vendors they recommend without adequate disclosure. If you take fees from several vendors, that is your business — but partnering with us comes with a disclosure obligation to your client, and we will not make an exception to it.
Questions
Tell us who your clients are and what keeps breaking. We will be straight about whether the fit is real.